I’ve owned a succession of Rover 200 & 400s over the last 20 years and have found them to be good cars. I bought a MG ZS120+ (2005, clean, fsh, std, 40k) from a dealer about 9 months ago and its reliability has been abysmal. The faults so far include: Misfire (HT leads); battery drain problem (new battery and alarm sounder); difficult to select gears (clutch master/slave cyl); Air con inop (recharge); SRS light on (driver’s seat belt); coolant loss (head gasket). Fortunately it has a warranty which has picked up a propotion of the costs. Many of the faults are recognisable from my previous cars – but spread over a number of years!
Are late Rovers/MGs less reliable than earlier models or is there a difference in reliability between Rovers & MGs?
Are late Rovers/MGs less reliable than earlier models or is there a difference in reliability between Rovers & MGs?