After browsing euroncap its shocking the difference between how older and newer cars fare, yet some new cars fail to protect their occupents effectively.
Its bizarre that the chevrolet kalos hatchback did better than the saloon version, the aveo. The hatch received 3 stars as opposed to the aveo's 2 and a strike.
The kalos was poor in the frontal impact with a 38% score - the aveo scored 19%.
It worries me how much the pedals and steering wheel are pushed back in such crash tests, and how the A-pillar is often loaded.
However, one thing does bemuse me more. Why does NCAP do off centre crashes and not head on with the middle of the bonnet touching the concrete barrier first? I really cannot understand why this happens?
Its bizarre that the chevrolet kalos hatchback did better than the saloon version, the aveo. The hatch received 3 stars as opposed to the aveo's 2 and a strike.
The kalos was poor in the frontal impact with a 38% score - the aveo scored 19%.
It worries me how much the pedals and steering wheel are pushed back in such crash tests, and how the A-pillar is often loaded.
However, one thing does bemuse me more. Why does NCAP do off centre crashes and not head on with the middle of the bonnet touching the concrete barrier first? I really cannot understand why this happens?