MG-Rover.org Forums banner

Modifying a 160 vvc head for turbocharging (picture heavy)

14K views 35 replies 13 participants last post by  gnu  
#1 ·
One day a man came to visit me and said that he was intending to turbocharge a TF and that he wanted to use the VVC head, and asked me if I could help by modifying the combustion chambers and ports. I said yes and I did a few simulations of some ideas I had in my old employment and asked if he'd like them done, and he agreed.

The head was a good condition vvc 160 unit with relatively poor cast features but good guide to valve cocentricity and no scary features.

As it was going on a pressure charged engine I decided to go to town on the ports and combustion chamber, match the manifolds, both inlet and exhaust (sometimes controversial), but to watch my hotspots and leave metal to transfer heat away from the valves.


The head started like this:
Image



The first job I attended to was to clean up the water passages. I do not have photos of this, but they look good now.


The second job was to clean up the casting near the VVC hydraulic control unit (HCU) rack
This photo shows the HCU rack boss after the casting flash had been removed:
Image



I then radiused the cam ladder oilways that flow around the ladder bolts as the passages are quite narrow and you don't want to lose unnecessary oil pressure to the cam bearings. If you don't quite follow then think of a bellmouth and how it prevents losses to turbulence and recirculation.
The first picture shoes standard and the second after radiusing -
Image


Image



I then used rotary sanding tools to clean up the coolant passage elbow, and thought that the Magpies would like something shiny, so I cleaned off the surface corrosion
Image



I use a Makita die grinder (240v) with a home-made variable speed control for heavy cuts and large diameters, but I also use these kinds of tools when I have a nice soft aluminium head to alter, especially for combustion chambers:
Image


Image



These are the inlet ports, as viewed from the manifold.
You can see quite a high surface roughness, a rather nasty casting line on the web between the ports, the seats are not well aligned with the port walls, and the web is quite thick leading to a rather blunt bifrucation into each valve from the port entrance.
Image


The was simply cleaned up, the shape of the valve guide bosses were smoothed out but not completely removed as it uses a cut down valve stem guide and I wanted to retain some metal to dump heat to. Conventional wisdom suggests that the valve guide boss should be removed to prevent a partial throat in the port, and I also take that view, but in a forced induction engine I like so metal to take up excess transferred heat from the inevitable too-much-boost so it was a compromise.
The bifrucation was taken down to a knife edge with a little special thing done to it, so that's why there no pictures.


The exhaust port looked like this:
Image


Normal practise with naturally aspirated engines suggests that you leave the port a smaller diameter than the exhaust manifold branch it will flow into, to prevent flow reversion. This is generally good advice, unless you really know otherwise from experience with certain cams or you're building a super-screamer and don't care about torque spread, only HORRRRRSEPOWWWWER.
This head was for a pressure charged engine that was going to go around a track as a toy, and a close coupled turbocharger generally destroys both the good and bad waves in the exhaust flow so I decided to match the ports due to the exhaust design being nozzled (that's for another day) into the collector before the turbo.
With this in mind I attacked it with a die grinder,
Image


then a barrage of smaller tools
Image


Then started the smoothing process
Image


With the ports finally smoothed out I moved to the combustion chamber (the above was not the last polish, you can see that in the last picture)
The standard chambers looked like this:
Image


Image


This image shows the machining that Rover did around the valves to make the 143 into the 160 (plus other things) and is included purely for interest
Image


and this is what low valve lift would look like, and hence how the pocketing helps:
Image


and here is a polished up chamber for comparison. The pocket machining has been fully radiused out and blended all the way up to the spark plug hole. Officinados will see an abused squish lip - oh no!
Image


In a former life I was an engine researcher for companies that you may have heard of, and did all manner of good and stupid things on cylinder heads which were perched on a quartz glass cylinder so we could watch combustion take place, fuel atomisation, turbulence, swirl, tumble and squish and other things.
So with this in mind I decided to use some of the last things I worked on (not with Rover, i'll add) in this head and did some measurements that I will not labour you with. One key measurement is the injection angle, which is illustrated here with a paint brush handle:
Image


This shows, as some will already know, that the k-series injection strategy is over the valve towards the centre of the cylinder where it will join with the tumble to mix, before moving back up during compression, be concentrated by the squish lip, which will then present a rich mixture near the sparkplug. This then gives a good flame kernel which leads to a progressive burn. And this a key reason the K-series has a good emissions profile.

The real measurements have to be done with the the manifold on:
Image


After all of that is said and done I needed to remove more metal to lower the compression ratio (CR) and wanted certain swirl characteristics that the squish lip won't lend itself to.

I would like to make it clear that I do not believe myself to be smarter than the Rover engine design team, but I was working in this area for a number of years and a number of years after Rover had finished development with all that that delivered, such as good CFD, simpler laser doppler velocimetry, and other good research and design tools, so I just wanted to use something new on an already good design.

I created opposing squish lips/jets, one straight towards the plug, and one offset to drive more swirl near TDC.
Image


The offset nature of the exhaust jet can be seen here:
Image


and this is the completed head, complete with hand sanded ports:
Image


The head was then cleaned up, degreased, and bagged.

Sadly the man no longer wants it as he is not going ahead with his car and bought a Nissan Skyline instead, so I wont know if the squish jets worked well, whether it helped or hindered emissions or anything about it's performance.
I've ground the valves in and fitted valve stem oil seals and the spring gear and put it back in it's bag.

I'd cry, but I was paid.
 
#5 ·
I believe now you have posted the picture someone may be interested in buying it off you :) You have a huge knowledge, especially when you provide technical description and answers people normally ask on here...Are you an engineer?
 
#6 · (Edited)
As long as you have the other VVC bits to build it up.
You'll need the cams, HCU, VVC mechanisms, tappets and new gaskets and seals.

As it sits here it comprises of the main casting, cam ladder, valve gear (minus tappets) and bolts to hold it together.

[edit]
Mr Shinigami,
Yes, an ex-engine research engineer, and now a different type of thermodynamics-related engineer.
 
#8 ·
Shaping and smoothing the ports from a production casting is always important, no matter what the aspiration type is.

I'm sure you'll agree it would have been churlish not to do it when the head was on the bench, regardless of anything else.


No, his name wasn't Adam. It was Alan, which is close.
 
#11 ·
I dont have any of the VVC bits to be fair Black O.
I just want it to look at and smile< maybe turn into a nice coffee table :rofl:

I have decided to keep my 135 and see whether i can squeeze a quart from a pint pot (on a very tight and not lavish budget).

My car is quick enough for me so i have abandoned any 160 or above asperations.
 
#12 ·
Blackoctagon.. just reading this topic, and looking at the pictures inspires me to ask, is that head only good now for using with a turbo, or does it offer some benefit for a current standard 160 engine, since what you have done is specific to premise?.
 
#14 ·
Mr Bateson,
I'd be a bit upset if it was only an ornament, simply because the outside of the casting is as-cast, so it looks rough.

Mr Incony,
I think it would make a naturally aspirated engine work well enough if it was treated as a replacement head, but the ports are larger than you would want for a NA engine, so if you put it on expecting mega performance you may be disappointed due to the port velocities and the lower CR. It would behave well at high RPM, but may leave the low range feeling breathless.

As a replacement, and keeping the VVC in place I think it's 'good' features would offset the 'bad' ones, so a 160 engine may become a 159 or a 161.

As a modified NA unit you would probably want to skim it to within an inch of it's life to get the CR back up then use silly cams.
I think in that case you would need to use non-phased cams.


Mr BMW,
It can be sold as the man who wanted it has compensated me for my time and left it with me, but it is only the two castings and valve gear (minus tappets - although I may have some in my stores). There are no cams or VVC units.
 
#15 ·
Thanks for the reply, blackoctagon... it tells me what i wanted to know.. since right now ive a driveable 160 with a cam sensor fault.. ( i think - since its a rev limiting fault status on the ecu ) so i am going to have to do some delving into that and like Sergi, a known good head is a good place to start, if one has all the parts needed to make it complete..

What you tell me , blackoctagon is your re fettled mgf 160 head is not the one i should consider, i would be better off dealing with the one i have already, if i want to...

looking on the web.. even a basic re fettled mgf head might be ÂŁ450 so i think you should earn yourself a christmas present for all that hard work and time... :)
 
#16 ·
Mr Incony,
Yes, that is what i'm suggesting - it's not for you unless you are going to pressure charge or build a very high RPM head.

I will probably put it on ebay or tell some Lotus or Caterham people it's here - they don't mind revving and a lack of low down torque.
 
#17 ·
Looking very nice :broon:

What kind of price would you be looking for? I have a standard 143 vvc head that was going on my turbo block but may he interested in this :) Alternatively would you be interested in doing another if I provided a head?

I was thinking of talking to Dave Andrews sometime next year about working on one for the build but I'm not sure on his turbo experience, you obviously know what you're doing in that respect.
 
#18 ·
Mr Gotenks,

Mr 25X has already asked for a MPi head and maifold, and I have my own and another one to do so i'm fully booked up until next summer (I travel a lot for business and have little time at home now), so i'd rather not take on another head as it would be almost a 9 moths/1 year before it would be ready.

I will happily sell you that head if you wish. Decide what it's worth to you (+p&p) and send me a message.

Although I don't know Mr Andrews on a personal level, his reputation in port work is second to none as far as I can see for the k-series, but you would have to ask him about his pressure charging work. I've read his posts and website and he seems a helpful and knowledgeable man so i'm sure he would talk you through his thoughts.
Bear in mind that as a professional he will give you some kind of guarantee of flow etc. from testing, whereas I no longer have easy access to these types of facilities so I am only modifying from experience and will only say "It should work well".
 
#23 ·
I have a feeling as the K turbo conversion is gaining in popularity you might find more people asking for headwork like this. I'm an admin on the K turbo owners forum on FB, I know of at least two other people who would be after similar headwork.

Not interested in making a few ÂŁÂŁÂŁ at all?
 
#22 ·
Crumbs, this is something of a thread revival!!! But I am glad because I didn't see it first time round!

I love the attention to detail on this head, and the revised squish lips now mirrored on both sides of the combustion chamber.

I have a DVA ported VVC head intended for forced induction - I'd post the pictures here, but I don't have picture publication rights for this forum - but probably a similar strategy for the porting, but with a squish chamber left as per standard...

How is that modified head performing in France - have you had much feedback from the new owner? :)
 
#24 ·
Dr Bell,
The squish jest were not mirrored - one was offset to create more near-TDC swirl.

I use Photobucket for my pictures and I like it.

Not much other than just afterwards. C'est la vie.



Mr Ring,
I only build heads for free, I don't build them for profit. Even that head was paid for with beer before it was cancelled.
That way I can take as long as I want with them - that's the trade off.

My day job is quite good, and most people wouldn't want to pay my hourly consultancy rates for cylinder head work, so it's more effective to make money on contracts.
 
#25 ·
Dr Bell,
The squish jest were not mirrored - one was offset to create more near-TDC swirl.

I use Photobucket for my pictures and I like it.

Not much other than just afterwards. C'est la vie.
That's a shame we haven't heard more - it would be great to know whether your efforts paid off or not? Offset on one of the squish jets duly noted :)

Do you think that those squish jets would work well on a NASP engine as well - or do you see this as an "optimised for forced induction" design?
 
#26 ·
Dr Bell,
It made over 270bhp, apparently, when tuned up and turbocharged in an Elise. The gearbox broke this summer, apparently.
To the best of my recollection it was on standard valve seats and guides and had a standard crank, but better pistons and rods, and blanked VVC units.
I'd like to think it was due to all that torque, and i'm probably at least half right.

I did a great deal of research (well funded company research, not garage research) back in the day on in-cylinder events and mixture preparation across a lot of engine types (SI and CI), placing squish lips amongst other things, and it is my opinion that these types of modifications would work well on the VVC engine in n/a form due to it's already fantastic 3D flow characteristics (tumble + swirl), but as I have no access to the kinds of equipment to establish such things it would only ever be an opinion.

I'm doing it to my own head certainly, but without the back-to-back testing of standard head and a jetted head, or more importantly for me, a modified head and a modified and jetted head I just can't be sure, and i'm not going to do it due to cost and aggravation.

My own head's jets would depend on what I do with the pistons - if they are quite domed with big valve pockets it will interfere with the swirl to the degree that there is no real point in having two - a deep single in the standard position to guide the squish towards the plug would probably be best.
With dished pistons (as that engine had) where there is a decent bowl at TDC the opposed and offset jets should really pay off. The other issue is that the higher volumetric efficiency of the turbo engine puts a lot of air in, which then gets compressed, which then becomes denser but more importantly more viscous, and so the extra forcing from the geometry should help drive more swirl.


Money (wife) permitting, my ideal spec would be higher compression pistons to go with it, probably enough to get 11.2:1, some h-beam rods, with that Piper exhaust cam and my higher port head with my inlet 'Megafold'.
But that's a story for another day...........
 
#30 ·
I did a great deal of research (well funded company research, not garage research) back in the day on in-cylinder events and mixture preparation across a lot of engine types (SI and CI), placing squish lips amongst other things, and it is my opinion that these types of modifications would work well on the VVC engine in n/a form due to it's already fantastic 3D flow characteristics (tumble + swirl), but as I have no access to the kinds of equipment to establish such things it would only ever be an opinion.

I'm doing it to my own head certainly, but without the back-to-back testing of standard head and a jetted head, or more importantly for me, a modified head and a modified and jetted head I just can't be sure, and i'm not going to do it due to cost and aggravation.
When one approaches this level of modification, objective testing is important, but also really rather expensive as you say! Probably not in the realms of us mere mortals sadly. But 270bhp is pretty impressive from a K-series! I'd have thought that block rigidity would start to become an important part of reliability at this level though?

Shame that there are not more 1.8T TCi-Tech engines about... ;)
 
#28 ·
Mr.111,
Your ignorance is entirely pardoned.
The inlet Megafold is my ongoing work on a longer tract inlet manifold with a slightly bigger plenum volume and an angled approach so the air enters the head at an angle to attempt to get the benefits of a higher centerlined port without as much work on the head.

Prototype 1 was given away, prototype 2 was aborted, and i'm now at prototype 3 stage.