Comparing MGR 2001 production to Jan-Mar 2004:
25/Z range from 43% to 41% (of total).
45/Z range from 26% to 15%
75/Z range from 23% to 28%
F/TF range from 07% to 08%
CityRover from 00% to 09%.
CR are sales figures, I suppose, compared to production figures for the MGR range. However, what it highlights to me is although the 45 replacement is still 18 months off, sales are falling rapidly. I think 18 months is too long for the 45 replacement. The solution? Speed it up or get someone to make a replacement like Tata has done for the CR. MGR is going to hurt trying to make the 45 last so long. Of course, with the facelift coming out, sales may steady but I don’t think it will do enough to drive sales upwards. Roll on the 45 replacement asap. Then they can focus on the 25 replacement, then the 75…the TF ….. :boxedin:
25/Z range from 43% to 41% (of total).
45/Z range from 26% to 15%
75/Z range from 23% to 28%
F/TF range from 07% to 08%
CityRover from 00% to 09%.
CR are sales figures, I suppose, compared to production figures for the MGR range. However, what it highlights to me is although the 45 replacement is still 18 months off, sales are falling rapidly. I think 18 months is too long for the 45 replacement. The solution? Speed it up or get someone to make a replacement like Tata has done for the CR. MGR is going to hurt trying to make the 45 last so long. Of course, with the facelift coming out, sales may steady but I don’t think it will do enough to drive sales upwards. Roll on the 45 replacement asap. Then they can focus on the 25 replacement, then the 75…the TF ….. :boxedin: