I haven't a clue, but for a laugh I will guess at 1.25 seconds.

 

my 103 IS does 60 in about 9.9 if i really mash it. i am planning to try pulling off in 2nd gear and just flooring it all the way to 60. just for the hell of it.

 

The 103PS is 10.3 and the 84PS is 11.2.

So there is not a big massive gap between them but enough. Whats more intresting is the diffrence in torque between them.

Both from memmory but I am sure they are correct. If they are not sombody will be along to correct them.

 

200 does 0-60 in 10.00 secs (according to www.carfolio.com).

thats all sadly, rover 25 has no times listed

 

Well just checked 103Ps is 10.3 and the 84PS is 11.8 so only slightly out.

These are Rover figures, so real worls ones could be + or -.

 

pretty much all performance figures (apart from maybe bhp) are nearly always conservative.

My old corsa's official 0-60 was 14.0 and I could do it in about 12.5 and when I got my SDi parker's said it would take 9.8 to do the sprint but I managed it once in 8.2! (before I put my fat tyres on it!)

they'll both be faster than those figures but I dunno how much faster than each other they'll be...

 

Parkers is a bit of a weird on, all the 1.4 105 200 are rated at over 10 secs yet my 1.4 IS is rated below??

 

Im not certain, but i think the figures on parkers are an average of your car under different loads doing 0-60.

 

Well the only difference the 1.4 has across the range is trim level. Fair enough air con could add a difference in weight, but different coloured carpets or material for seats making me a second faster??? Would be nice to think so

 

hehe go faster carpets, no i cant explain why the IS is supposedly quicker, maybe you should just count yourself lucky and rub it in other peoples faces that you've got the fastest standard 1.4

 

in the 1.4 16v you could make close to 9 secs, me and my mate did it, and yea we were sad enopugh to put it on you tube too. chech out my 1.1 0-60 too whilst you're there lol.

1.4 16v - www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DHrgjl9lpM

1.1 lol - www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xNPiqS5DHs

These are 200's though...

 

The IS is no quicker. I dont think Rover did anything on the 200 like on the Metro with close ratio boxes and stuff.

Parkers is not very reliable for stuff like this.

 

lol I know, its just a point I like briniging up when people mention parker's figures

 

just watched them vids, the 1.1 is a tad pants but that 1.4 tears it!